Wednesday, October 8, 2025

EU compliance: An opportunity to strengthen AI strategies

Ana Paula Assis of IBM casts an eye over the EU AI Act, outlining the critical steps for compliance and the advantages it will bring

The EU AI Act has ushered in a new age for artificial intelligence in Europe. As the world’s first comprehensive legal framework for AI, the act has been developed to ensure the safety and transparency of AI systems across the EU. This new framework will be hugely beneficial for businesses, bringing certainty and clear guardrails for AI strategies for the first time. Creating a roadmap towards compliance should be a top priority for businesses in 2024. 

A risk-based approach

Understanding the Act’s risk-based approach is the first stage in the journey to compliance. This approach, intended to promote safe AI usage while encouraging innovation, requires AI systems to be classified and regulated based on the risk they pose. Risk levels span from “unacceptable” practices, including social scoring, to “high-risk” areas like credit scoring, “limited risk” use like chatbots, and “minimal risk” applications, such as spam filters. Generative AI will not be classified as high-risk, but its usage must comply with transparency requirements and EU copyright law, including AI-generated content disclosure and summaries of copyrighted training data. The EU has adopted a phased implementation approach, with prohibitions taking effect in six months and most provisions applicable in two years. 

With set timelines in place, organisations should start preparing to meet the standards as soon as possible. The first step is completing a comprehensive model inventory. Performing a thorough inventory of all your business’s AI and ML applications will provide you with a clear view of your data and applications subject to the act. 

The second step is undertaking a comprehensive risk assessment to ensure all relevant obligations are fulfilled. For example, high-risk AI use cases come with seven essential requirements related to human oversight, technical robustness, privacy and data governance, transparency, fairness, and accountability. A complete risk assessment will also consider reputational and operational risks. 

The third step is implementing technical standards. European standardisation organisations are developing new technical standards to facilitate this, as has the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), which recently released a new standard called ISO42001, to be adopted by the EU as a framework for risk management systems. 

Building a responsible, ethical ecosystem 

Organisations should view the compliance process as an opportunity to strengthen AI governance strategies. By building a framework for responsible, governed AI, businesses can confidently operate, manage risk and reputation, and build trust among employees and stakeholders. 

Establishing an AI ethics board is paramount in building this ecosystem. Compliance with the Act demands a certain level of ethical consideration, but companies must also define their ethical approach to AI and establish guidelines to direct implementation and future innovation. 

While there will still be challenges ahead – such as a steep learning curve for less regulated sectors or the emergence of diverging global frameworks – the EU AI Act signifies an important step for the future of responsible AI and one that promises to bring increased competitiveness and innovation to Europe and beyond. 

About The Author

Ana Paula Assis is Chair and General Manager, EMEA, IBM.   

Latest

Why too many women are being failed in the workplace

Krystal Wilkinson of Manchester Metropolitan University examines why all...

Finance needs rethinking for systemic change to support sustainability

Systemic change may sound radical, but clinging to outdated...

The art of negotiating with different personality styles

Expert and author Paul Grant examines the dos and...

Unmissable reads from the Business Book Awards 2025

The winners of the Business Book Awards 2025 were...

Subscribe To Our Content

Don't miss

Why too many women are being failed in the workplace

Krystal Wilkinson of Manchester Metropolitan University examines why all...

Finance needs rethinking for systemic change to support sustainability

Systemic change may sound radical, but clinging to outdated...

The art of negotiating with different personality styles

Expert and author Paul Grant examines the dos and...

Unmissable reads from the Business Book Awards 2025

The winners of the Business Book Awards 2025 were...

National Coding Week: Demystifying the changing face of software development

To mark National Coding Week, a panel of experts...

Why too many women are being failed in the workplace

Krystal Wilkinson of Manchester Metropolitan University examines why all too often women’s health isn’t being taken seriously in the workplace, and asks what can...

Finance needs rethinking for systemic change to support sustainability

Systemic change may sound radical, but clinging to outdated financial models while climate change and social inequality upend our world is far riskier,
says Hans...

The art of negotiating with different personality styles

Expert and author Paul Grant examines the dos and don'ts of negotiation, and explains why understanding different personalities can help you adapt your approach...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here